We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Invicti is a web application DAST platform, and replacing it means checking more than the scanner’s finding list: verify authenticated scans, API and GraphQL coverage, CI/CD fit, deployment options and price. Reddit users considering a switch cite limited API results, the work of keeping OpenAPI specs current, and findings developers struggle to interpret. The options below cover web testing and adjacent AppSec needs. Several are not direct DAST replacements, so confirm coverage before moving a production scanning workflow.
01Why people leave Invicti
API coverage falls short
Reddit users report limited results for GraphQL and concern about business-logic testing as their API inventories grow.
OpenAPI upkeep creates friction
One Reddit thread describes teams chasing service owners for updated specs to upload before scanning.
Findings and CI/CD need work
A Reddit user wanted more interpretable results and authenticated scans that fit a modern web-app pipeline.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Broader AppSec coverage
SnykSnykSnyk is the closest fit here if the goal is to consolidate more than DAST: it covers code, dependencies, IaC, containers and AI security, with IDE and CI/CD integrations. The listed starting price is $25 with a free plan. Compare its web and API scan coverage, usage costs and export options against the Invicti workflows you rely on before migrating.
Trade-off: It is broader AppSec, not a confirmed one-for-one DAST replacement.
6.7/10from
$25/mofree plan - Manual web testing
Burp SuiteBurp SuiteBurp Suite fits teams that want a toolkit for manual web application testing and HTTP traffic analysis. Its listed starting price is $41.58, with a free plan. It can sit alongside developer workflows for investigating web issues, but confirm paid features and deployment fit before treating it as a replacement for automated, authenticated CI/CD scans.
Trade-off: The stated fit is manual testing, not automated DAST parity.
7.5/10from
$41.58/mofree plan - Code-focused AppSec
SemgrepSemgrepSemgrep suits teams that want code scanning and custom security rules rather than relying on a runtime scanner alone. The listed starting price is $15, with a free plan. It may complement a DAST migration by covering code-focused checks, but validate coverage gaps and triage needs; it should not be assumed to scan deployed web apps or APIs like Invicti.
Trade-off: Code-focused scanning does not establish runtime coverage.
7.5/10from
$15/mofree plan - Centralized risk visibility
VeracodeVeracodeVeracode is worth evaluating when security and governance teams need broad application-risk coverage and centralized visibility. Pricing is custom, so compare a quote with Invicti at your actual scan volume. Confirm the integrations and deployment model required by your developers, and verify whether its web and API scanning fits your authenticated CI/CD use cases.
Trade-off: Custom pricing and unconfirmed integration details complicate comparison.
5.2/10from
Custom - Secrets scanning
TruffleHogTruffleHogTruffleHog is an open-source option for scanning source and Git history, with Enterprise analysis also available. It is relevant if secrets exposure is part of the AppSec work you want to cover while replacing or supplementing Invicti. Check Enterprise deployment and pricing terms, and plan separately for web application and API DAST coverage.
Trade-off: It scans for secrets, not web application vulnerabilities.
7.4/10from
Freefree plan - Credential security
GitGuardianGitGuardianGitGuardian focuses on credentials across repositories, developer guardrails and machine identities. Its free tier gives teams a way to assess that part of their security workflow; paid plans are priced by sales, and the platform is self-hostable. Consider it if credential risk is a gap, but keep a separate plan for authenticated web and API DAST.
Trade-off: Credential security is an adjacent control, not DAST.
6.8/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Invicti Invicti (current) | 6.3 | Custom | No | Teams consolidating AppSec findings |
| Snyk Snyk | 6.7 | $25/mo | Yes | Teams consolidating AppSec scans |
| Burp Suite Burp Suite | 7.5 | $41.58/mo | Yes | Manual web security testing |
| Semgrep Semgrep | 7.5 | $15/mo | Yes | Teams that write custom security rules |
| Veracode Veracode | 5.2 | Custom | No | Enterprise security and governance teams |
| TruffleHog TruffleHog | 7.4 | Free | Yes | Teams scanning source and Git history |
| GitGuardian GitGuardian | 6.8 | Free | Yes | Teams monitoring secrets across repositories |
Questions people ask
Which alternative is closest to Invicti for DAST?
Burp Suite is the most directly relevant web-testing option in this list, but its stated fit is manual testing. Snyk and Veracode cover broader AppSec needs. None of these descriptions establishes equivalent authenticated API and web scanning, so validate those workflows in an evaluation before switching.
Which options have a free plan or open-source scanning?
Snyk, Burp Suite and Semgrep list free plans, alongside starting prices of $25, $41.58 and $15, respectively. TruffleHog offers free open-source scanning. These figures do not establish what a production deployment will cost; check plan limits, usage terms and enterprise pricing with each vendor.
What should developers verify before migrating from Invicti?
Test coverage for authenticated scans, REST and GraphQL APIs, business logic, and modern web apps. Check how scans enter CI/CD, how findings reach developers, and whether results and configuration can be exported. Confirm deployment requirements and total pricing at your planned scan volume before ending an Invicti contract.