programcode

Head-to-head · App security

Invicti vs Snyk

Choose Invicti for live-app testing and runtime validation; choose Snyk for developer workflows, a free tier and AI security.

Invicti

6.3/10
VS

Snyk

6.7/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

It's a split decision.

Invicti and Snyk overlap in code and supply-chain scanning, but they emphasize different parts of the stack. Invicti is the stronger fit when teams need proof-based testing of live web applications and APIs, runtime validation, or on-premises and air-gapped options. Snyk suits teams that want security tools integrated with IDEs, CI/CD, AI coding assistants and the CLI, plus a free tier. Compare Invicti subscription quotes with Snyk’s usage-based Enterprise credits before budgeting at scale.

01Side by side

InvictiSnyk
Pricing model$500 maximum per pentest; subscriptions quotedFree, $25/month Team, or Enterprise credits
Free tierNo free plan listedFree monthly plan with project and test quotas
Integrations110+ integrations, including GitHub Actions and ServiceNowIDEs, CI/CD, AI assistants, CLI, Jira
Deployment modelCloud hosting; Flex includes on-premises and air-gapped optionsWeb platform; deployment options aren't specified
PlatformsWebWeb
Limits and scalingPentest cap published; subscription limits aren'tTest quotas; Enterprise credits scale by activity
CLI and docsDocumentation link; CLI not listedCLI integration; docs listed on product site
Self-hostingAppSec Flex offers on-premises and air-gapped deploymentSelf-hosting options aren't specified

Choose Invicti if

  • You need proof-based testing of live web apps and APIs.
  • Runtime validation should help prioritize static findings.
  • On-premises or air-gapped deployment is a requirement.

Choose Snyk if

  • You want a free tier with defined test quotas.
  • Developers need IDE, CI/CD, CLI and AI assistant integrations.
  • Enterprise billing by product and activity fits your usage model.

02Pricing at real usage

Invicti’s Agentic Pentest costs up to $500 per pentest and includes delivery within 24 hours. Web + API, AppSec Core and AppSec Flex are monthly subscriptions, but the pricing page publishes no monthly or annual prices; Your AppSec is custom. No free plan is listed. Snyk’s free monthly tier allows 5 projects, 100 Snyk Code tests, 200 Open Source tests, 300 IaC tests and 100 Container tests. Team costs $25 per month for up to 10 developers, with 100 projects and 1,000 Snyk Code tests/month. Enterprise uses prepaid credits at $1 each, valid for the contract term. Rates vary by product and activity, and use beyond prepaid credits is invoiced in arrears. Snyk has a published entry price; ask Invicti for subscription quotes and Snyk for a usage estimate based on your scan volume.

03API, SDKs and integration

Invicti is a web platform with a homepage-listed ecosystem of 110+ integrations, including GitHub Actions, Asana, Azure Pipelines and ServiceNow. Its site links to documentation. The published integration details do not specify an API style, SDKs, supported programming languages or CLI. Snyk connects to IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, AI coding assistants including Claude Code, Cursor and Codex, source code managers, Jira and the CLI. That gives teams named options for placing checks in developer and build workflows. The published integration details do not specify Snyk API styles, SDKs or supported languages either. Neither product’s listed integrations establish that a particular repository host, build system or internal service is covered beyond the named examples. Check the vendors’ documentation for the exact connector behavior, authentication requirements and supported versions before making integration work a project assumption.

04Open source, self-hosting and lock-in

Invicti’s AppSec Flex plan includes Bring Any Cloud and on-premises options, with air-gapped deployment also listed. That matters if a team cannot send scanning data through a hosted service. Snyk’s published product details identify a web platform but do not specify self-hosting options. Neither vendor’s published details specify an open-source licence for the product or data-export formats. Before choosing, ask each vendor what findings, project configuration and history can be exported, in which formats, and whether exports include enough context to move to another tool. Also confirm whether an on-premises deployment changes integrations or support. Those answers determine how much migration work and operational dependence a rollout creates.

Questions people ask

What does Invicti security do?

Invicti combines code scanning, testing of live applications and vulnerability management. Its DAST tests running web applications and APIs with proof-based scanning; it also offers SAST, open-source risk scanning, IaC scanning, secrets detection and SBOM generation. Runtime reachability and exploitability help prioritize findings.

Why is Snyk used?

Snyk scans code, open-source dependencies, infrastructure as code and containers. Its platform also targets AI-generated code, development agents and AI applications. Teams can connect it with IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, AI coding assistants, source code managers, Jira and the CLI.

Can Invicti and Snyk replace each other?

They overlap in code and supply-chain security, but their stated strengths differ. Invicti emphasizes proof-based DAST, API testing and runtime validation. Snyk emphasizes developer-tool integrations and AI security. A team with both live-app testing and developer-workflow needs should compare feature coverage before consolidating.

Which is better for testing live web applications and APIs?

Invicti is the clearer fit based on its stated DAST focus: it tests running web applications and APIs and validates findings with proof-based scanning. Snyk lists API and Web in its Enterprise rate card, but the product details here do not describe comparable DAST capabilities.