We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Make is a hosted platform for visual workflows connecting apps and AI models, with centralized governance for organizations. Its listed price starts at $9, with a free plan, but that entry point does not show what a production workload will cost. Developers considering a replacement should compare deployment options, API and MCP support, and migration requirements alongside price. The alternatives below range from self-hosted workflow orchestration to managed API integrations and tools focused on specific ecosystems.
01Why people leave Make
Production cost is hard to assess
Make's listed starting price is $9, but model your workflow volume and confirm operational limits before scaling.
You need different developer controls
Teams looking for API-focused workflows or self-hosting may prefer a platform whose listed strengths cover those needs.
The best fit depends on your stack
One r/automation thread asked for cheaper, more flexible options; commenters praised Power Automate for Microsoft work and Relay's interface.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Best for self-hosting
n8nn8nn8n is the strongest fit here if you want to run workflow orchestration yourself: its listed strengths include self-hosting and inspectable AI steps. The listed starting price is $20, with a free plan, but compare costs against your actual workload. The available summary calls out API and migration needs as items to verify, so confirm both before moving Make workflows.
Trade-off: Self-hosting adds operational responsibility; confirm API and migration requirements.
7.4/10from
$20/mofree plan - Best for API integrations
PipedreamPipedreamPipedream is positioned for AI agents calling third-party APIs, managed OAuth and teams building integration catalogs. That makes it a closer fit than a visual workflow builder when API access and OAuth are central to the design. Its listed price starts at $99, with a free plan; validate production costs and quota behavior against your workload before committing.
Trade-off: The listed starting price is higher; validate production cost and quota behavior.
7.4/10from
$99/mofree plan - Best for Microsoft stacks
Power AutomatePower AutomatePower Automate fits teams whose workflows center on Microsoft 365, approvals, employee onboarding or legacy UI automation with RPA. Its listed starting price is $15. Before replacing Make, check the licensing model and migration path for your workflows; the platform's Microsoft focus is a reason to choose it, not a guarantee that other integrations will transfer cleanly.
Trade-off: Its strongest fit is Microsoft-centric; check licensing and migration paths.
7.0/10from
$15/mo - Best for API and MCP
MagicalMagicalMagical is worth considering when meeting follow-ups, connected notes, or API and MCP workflows match the job. Its listed starting price is $29, with a free plan. The published positioning does not settle whether its limits, export options or integrations fit a production system, so confirm those details and test the migration requirements before making it a replacement for broader Make workflows.
Trade-off: Confirm limits, export and integration details before adopting it.
5.8/10from
$29/mofree plan - Best for broad SaaS automation
ZapierZapierZapier is a hosted alternative for teams automating across many SaaS apps, with repeatable workflows and governance for employee-built automations. Its listed starting price is $19.99, with a free plan. The platform summary flags task-based costs and hosted deployment as constraints, so compare expected task volume and deployment requirements with Make rather than assuming the switch will lower costs.
Trade-off: Task-based costs and hosted deployment may not solve your main constraint.
7.1/10from
$19.99/mofree plan - Best for simple automations
IFTTTIFTTTIFTTT has the lowest listed starting price among these picks at $2.09, and a free plan is listed. Its stated fit is simple app-to-app automation, smart-home connections and prompt-built AI workflows. Consider it for narrow, low-complexity jobs rather than assuming it replaces Make's broader workflow needs; check developer details and production limits for your use case.
Trade-off: Its stated fit is basic automation; verify developer and production details.
6.3/10from
$2.09/mofree plan - Best for governed IT workflows
TinesTinesTines is aimed at governed automations, including security and IT workflows, and offers a free tier for evaluation. Its paid starting price is listed as n/a, so ask the vendor for a quote based on your team and workload. Confirm the API surface and operational limits before treating it as a replacement for Make across general app integrations.
Trade-off: Paid pricing and API details need confirmation.
7.3/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Make Make (current) | 7.1 | $9/mo | Yes | Teams automating across many apps |
| n8n n8n | 7.4 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams orchestrating repeatable business workflows |
| Pipedream Pipedream | 7.4 | $99/mo | Yes | AI apps that need MCP tools |
| Power Automate Power Automate | 7.0 | $15/mo | No | Microsoft 365 workflow automation |
| Magical Magical | 5.8 | $29/mo | Yes | Teams automating meeting follow-ups |
| Zapier Zapier | 7.1 | $19.99/mo | Yes | Teams connecting common business apps |
| IFTTT IFTTT | 6.3 | $2.09/mo | Yes | Simple app-to-app automations |
| Tines Tines | 7.3 | Free | Yes | Teams building governed automations |
Questions people ask
Which Make alternative is cheapest?
IFTTT has the lowest listed starting price among these alternatives at $2.09, with a free plan. That does not establish the lowest cost for a production workload: compare each platform's billing against your expected workflow volume, and confirm limits before moving a live system.
Which Make alternative can I self-host?
n8n is the alternative in this list explicitly positioned for self-hosting. That gives teams a deployment option beyond Make's hosted workflows, but it also means evaluating operational responsibility. Confirm n8n's API and migration requirements against your existing workflows before choosing it.
Can I migrate Make workflows directly to another platform?
Do not assume workflows will transfer directly. Check the target vendor's migration path, API requirements and export options, then inventory the apps, credentials and workflow logic you need to move. The listed alternatives have different deployment models and use cases, so migration effort will depend on your setup.