We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Helicone combines LLM routing with request-level cost visibility. A Reddit thread reports that following its acquisition by Mintlify, the project may move into maintenance mode, raising questions for teams that depend on it in production. The alternatives below cover different parts of that stack: hosted gateways, self-hosted routing, and observability tools. Before switching, decide which Helicone functions you need to keep, then check API compatibility, deployment requirements, and costs at your expected traffic.
01Why people leave Helicone
Maintenance-mode risk
A Reddit thread reports that Helicone may move into maintenance mode after its Mintlify acquisition, with security updates continuing but feature development likely ending.
Need evaluations or governance
A Reddit user looking beyond tracing reports that evaluation and governance needs can make a tracing-focused setup insufficient.
Different stack boundaries
Helicone combines routing and observability; alternatives may cover only a gateway, telemetry, or agent evaluation, so replacing it can mean choosing separate tools.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Best self-hosted gateway
LiteLLMLiteLLMLiteLLM is a free, open-source, self-hostable gateway for teams routing requests across model providers. It also supports shared access controls, which suits platform teams centralizing provider access. The vendor lists a free plan but no starting price. Treat the switch as an API-compatibility exercise, and pin releases and assess supply-chain risk before putting production credentials behind it.
Trade-off: A gateway replacement does not by itself establish equivalent request-level observability.
7.1/10from
Freefree plan - Best for model choice
OpenRouterOpenRouterOpenRouter offers one API across many models and providers, making it a fit for teams evaluating models, consolidating billing, or adding provider failover. The vendor lists a free plan but no starting price, and its model access is paid for flexibility. Confirm routing behavior and API compatibility against your production requirements before moving traffic from Helicone.
Trade-off: The published pricing information gives no starting price or usage limits.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - Best for centralized operations
PortkeyPortkeyPortkey centralizes model access and operations, with routing across LLM providers, logs, and controls. It is open source and self-hostable, and the pricing page lists a free plan with pricing from $49. For teams replacing Helicone's gateway role, compare deployment options and production pricing, then verify which logs and controls your migration needs to preserve.
Trade-off: Verify private deployment details and production costs before committing.
7.6/10from
$49/mofree plan - Best for OpenTelemetry
OpenLITOpenLITOpenLIT is an OpenTelemetry-native agent observability option for teams already using OpenTelemetry, self-hosted AI infrastructure, or GPU-backed LLM deployments. Its self-hosted edition is free and Apache 2.0 licensed. This is a fit when observability is the priority; assess separately how your stack will handle model routing if you also use Helicone as a gateway.
Trade-off: It is an observability choice, not a stated replacement for model routing.
7.7/10from
Freefree plan - Best for hosted routing
RequestyRequestyRequesty is a hosted gateway for routing across model providers, with fallback and centralized AI spend controls. It may suit teams that want gateway-managed fallback rather than custom retry logic. The vendor lists a free plan but no starting price; confirm costs and service limits at your expected usage, and check API compatibility before switching Helicone traffic.
Trade-off: Self-hosting and exact service limits need confirmation.
7.5/10from
Freefree plan - Best for cost controls
Eden AIEden AIEden AI is a hosted, OpenAI-compatible gateway for routing across AI providers, with per-request cost tracking and access controls. The pricing starts at $0, and the product is positioned for organizations needing EU data controls. It has no published self-hosting path, so compare its data and deployment model with your requirements before moving production requests.
Trade-off: No self-hosting path is published.
7.2/10from
Freefree plan - Best for agent evaluation
HoneyHiveHoneyHiveHoneyHive focuses on debugging multi-step AI agents, evaluating changes against datasets, and monitoring quality across live traffic. Choose it when the gap in your Helicone setup is agent tracing and evaluation rather than provider routing. Confirm integration details and production costs, and plan separately for gateway functions if your current Helicone deployment handles model access.
Trade-off: It is focused on agent observability, not described as a gateway.
7.4/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.8 | $79/mo | Yes | Teams routing across model providers | |
| 7.1 | Free | Yes | Platform teams managing multiple model providers | |
| 7.6 | Free | Yes | Teams evaluating models across providers | |
| 7.6 | $49/mo | Yes | Teams routing requests across LLM providers | |
| 7.7 | Free | Yes | Teams already using OpenTelemetry | |
| 7.5 | Free | Yes | Teams routing across multiple model providers | |
| 7.2 | Free | Yes | Teams routing across AI providers | |
| 7.4 | Free | Yes | Teams debugging multi-step AI agents |
Questions people ask
Which Helicone alternative is open source and self-hostable?
LiteLLM, OpenLIT, and Portkey are listed as open source and self-hostable. OpenLIT’s self-hosted edition is free and Apache 2.0 licensed. Compare the deployment and maintenance work you can support, and confirm which product covers routing, observability, or both for your stack.
Which alternative is cheapest for production use?
The listed starting prices include Portkey from $49, while Eden AI starts at $0. LiteLLM and OpenLIT have free options, but a free plan or self-hosted edition does not establish your total production cost. Check usage charges, service limits, and infrastructure costs against expected traffic.
How should we migrate away from Helicone?
First identify whether your deployment relies on routing, request-level cost visibility, or both. Then check each candidate’s API compatibility, deployment model, and pricing at your expected usage. For a replacement that covers only one part of Helicone’s role, plan how the remaining routing or observability function will be handled.