We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Applitools is a visual-testing service for comparing UI screenshots across browsers and devices. A Reddit thread describes its workflow as capturing screenshots—often through a web crawler or Selenium—and comparing them with a baseline. Its pricing starts at $667, with custom pricing and deployment options for larger teams. The alternatives below cover visual review, browser and device testing, and test management; they are not all drop-in replacements for screenshot comparison.
01Why people leave Applitools
Cost can be hard to justify
A Reddit discussion notes that cost may matter for smaller teams; compare included usage and plan pricing, not just starting prices.
Check claims about AI filtering
A Reddit commenter questioned a company representative’s claim of no false positives. Validate how difference detection fits your review process.
Baseline portability matters
Before switching, ask how to export or migrate visual baselines and test results; migration effort depends on what your team can retain.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Cross-browser coverage
BrowserStackBrowserStackBrowserStack is a hosted option for teams that need broad browser and device coverage alongside manual and automated testing. Its listed starting price is $29, with a free plan, below Applitools’ $667 starting price; that does not establish equivalent usage. Check plan limits and integration details against the browsers, devices and test volume your CI needs.
Trade-off: Hosted browser and device testing is not the same as Applitools’ visual-comparison workflow.
7.0/10from
$29/mofree plan - Storybook UI reviews
ChromaticChromaticChromatic fits teams already using Storybook that want UI checks and review in pull requests, with visual and accessibility checks in the workflow. The listed starting price is $179, with a free plan. Compare its included usage with your project’s needs before treating that lower starting price as a like-for-like cost reduction.
Trade-off: Its fit is strongest for Storybook teams, not every UI testing stack.
7.8/10from
$179/mofree plan - Selenium and Appium
Sauce LabsSauce LabsSauce Labs combines hosted browser and device testing with AI-assisted test authoring and analysis. It is a candidate for teams already using Selenium or Appium that want to consolidate testing tools. The listed starting price is $39; check the plan and usage needed for your device and test mix before comparing it with Applitools.
Trade-off: Hosted testing does not by itself replace visual baselines and comparison.
7.0/10from
$39/mo - Manual browser checks
BrowserlingBrowserlingBrowserling offers hosted remote browsers for teams doing manual cross-browser checks, with a listed starting price of $9 and a free plan. It may suit a smaller workflow where engineers need browser access more than automated visual regression. Review the operational and integration details before making it part of an automated CI pipeline.
Trade-off: It is positioned for manual checks, not as a full visual-regression workflow.
6.5/10from
$9/mofree plan - Mobile build testing
AppetizeAppetizeAppetize targets teams sharing mobile builds and running cloud iOS simulators or Android emulators. It provides a browser interface, CLI and REST API, and is listed as self-hostable. The starting price is $59, with a free plan. Those deployment and interface options may suit mobile workflows, but they do not make it a general browser visual-testing replacement.
Trade-off: Its focus is mobile simulation, not cross-browser visual regression.
7.2/10from
$59/mofree plan - Jira test management
XrayXrayXray is a lower-cost option when the problem is test planning and execution in Jira rather than screenshot comparison. It links test workflows to requirements, with a listed starting price of $10. This is a workflow change, not a direct Applitools substitute; evaluate it only if keeping tests and coverage in Jira addresses your need.
Trade-off: It does not replace visual screenshot comparison.
6.3/10from
$10/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Applitools Applitools (current) | 6.8 | $667/mo | No | Teams with frequent UI changes |
| BrowserStack BrowserStack | 7.0 | $29/mo | Yes | Teams testing across many browsers |
| Chromatic Chromatic | 7.8 | $179/mo | Yes | Teams already using Storybook |
| Sauce Labs Sauce Labs | 7.0 | $39/mo | No | Teams testing mobile apps on real devices |
| Browserling Browserling | 6.5 | $9/mo | Yes | Manual cross-browser checks |
| Appetize Appetize | 7.2 | $59/mo | Yes | Teams sharing mobile builds |
| Xray Xray | 6.3 | $10/mo | No | Teams already using Jira |
Questions people ask
Which Applitools alternative is cheapest?
Among these picks, Browserling has the lowest listed starting price at $9 and a free plan; Xray starts at $10. These are not equivalent products or usage allowances. Compare the features, limits and volume in the plan you would actually use before calling either a cheaper replacement.
Which alternative has a REST API?
Appetize is specifically described as offering a REST API, as well as a browser interface and CLI. The other picks have different stated integrations, including Storybook for Chromatic and Selenium or Appium for Sauce Labs. Confirm current API access, authentication and request quotas with each vendor.
Can I replace Applitools with an open-source tool?
None of these picks is identified as open source. Appetize is listed as self-hostable, which is not the same as an open-source licence. If self-hosting or source access is a requirement, confirm deployment terms, licence rights and data export with the vendor before planning a migration.