We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Nintex is a workflow automation platform for cross-department processes and governed deployments, including connections between business systems. Its pricing is custom, and its code-level integration story is unclear, so developers comparing replacements should validate API access, migration paths and production limits before committing. One Reddit thread describes difficulty recreating Nintex 2016 flexi tasks in Power Automate; another reports slow Nintex form loading. Alternatives below range from self-hosted n8n to hosted integration platforms, with published starting prices where available.
01Why people leave Nintex
Custom pricing
Nintex uses custom pricing, making costs harder to compare with alternatives that publish starting prices.
Migration needs redesign
A Reddit migration thread describes difficulty recreating Nintex 2016 flexi tasks in Power Automate.
Form loading complaints
One Reddit user reports slow Nintex form loading and says users disliked the wait.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Self-hosted workflows
n8nn8nn8n is the clearest fit if you want to inspect workflow logic and control deployment: it is open source and self-hostable, with a free plan and a listed starting price of $20. It supports inspectable AI steps. Confirm API coverage and migration requirements against your Nintex workflows before moving them.
Trade-off: You take on self-hosting and should verify integrations before migration.
7.4/10from
$20/mofree plan - Microsoft 365 teams
Power AutomatePower AutomatePower Automate is built for Microsoft 365 workflows, approvals and employee onboarding, with a listed starting price of $15. It is a natural candidate when moving Nintex workflows toward SharePoint Online, but a Reddit migration thread describes difficulty recreating flexi tasks. Map those task behaviors before planning the move.
Trade-off: Check licensing, limits and migration paths before scaling.
7.0/10from
$15/mo - API integrations
PipedreamPipedreamPipedream is a hosted integration layer for apps that need MCP tools or teams avoiding OAuth infrastructure. The pricing page lists a free plan and a $99 starting price. It may fit code-oriented integration work better than a business workflow suite, but verify quotas and recovery behavior before routing production events.
Trade-off: Hosted service; check quotas and recovery behavior.
7.4/10from
$99/mofree plan - Visual app workflows
MakeMakeMake offers hosted workflows for connecting apps and AI models, with visual workflow and agent builders. Its listed starting price is $9, with a free plan. That gives teams a lower published entry point than quote-only Nintex, but confirm costs and operational limits against expected workflow volume.
Trade-off: Confirm costs and operational limits before scaling.
7.1/10from
$9/mofree plan - Common app automation
ZapierZapierZapier targets app-to-app automation across common business tools and offers IT oversight. Its pricing page lists a free plan and a $19.99 starting price, making entry costs easier to compare with custom-priced Nintex. The fit is strongest for routine workflows; task-volume costs can rise in production.
Trade-off: Costs can rise with task volume.
7.1/10from
$19.99/mofree plan - Enterprise integrations
WorkatoWorkatoWorkato is aimed at enterprises integrating many business systems, with workflow and AI-agent governance and on-prem connectivity. That scope may suit cross-department Nintex deployments. Pricing is quote-only, so ask for projected costs at your workflow volume and confirm developer interfaces and deployment requirements before committing.
Trade-off: Quote-only pricing complicates cost planning.
7.2/10from
Custom - Complex operations
DecisionsDecisionsDecisions is positioned for cross-system operations, legacy core systems, and governed rules and AI. It may fit organizations replacing broad operational workflows rather than simple app connections. Its listed starting price is $4,000; confirm developer interfaces and deployment needs before treating it as a code-level alternative.
Trade-off: High starting price and limited public developer detail.
6.4/10from
$4,000/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Nintex Nintex (current) | 6.0 | Custom | No | Organizations automating cross-department processes |
| n8n n8n | 7.4 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams orchestrating repeatable business workflows |
| Power Automate Power Automate | 7.0 | $15/mo | No | Microsoft 365 workflow automation |
| Pipedream Pipedream | 7.4 | $99/mo | Yes | AI apps that need MCP tools |
| Make Make | 7.1 | $9/mo | Yes | Teams automating across many apps |
| Zapier Zapier | 7.1 | $19.99/mo | Yes | Teams connecting common business apps |
| Workato Workato | 7.2 | Custom | No | Enterprises integrating many business systems |
| Decisions Decisions | 6.4 | $4,000/mo | No | Teams coordinating cross-system operations |
Questions people ask
Are Nintex forms going away?
We can't confirm that Nintex Forms are being discontinued. Before planning a replacement, ask Nintex for support and end-of-life dates for your specific Forms version and compatibility with your SharePoint deployment. If the concern is slow loading, compare the user-facing form experience in your own environment.
Does Nintex work with SharePoint Online?
A Reddit migration thread describes moving Nintex 2016 lists and flows to SharePoint Online and Power Automate, but that does not establish current compatibility. Confirm which Nintex product and version supports your SharePoint Online setup, and how forms and task actions migrate.
What is replacing Power Automate?
There is no single replacement in this comparison. n8n offers open-source self-hosting; Make and Zapier focus on hosted app workflows; Pipedream targets API integrations and MCP tools. Choose based on deployment, workflow behavior and cost at your expected volume, then verify migration requirements.