We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Factory combines coding agents with team controls, model choice and self-hosting. The alternatives below cover persistent agents, IDE and CLI workflows, GitHub-native sessions, spec-first development and codebase-wide changes. Their listed starting prices range from $8 to $20, while Cody has a $16K annual minimum. Those figures do not establish what a team will spend at its actual usage. Before migrating, confirm API and SDK support, usage limits, data export and how each tool fits your existing review and CI workflows.
01Why people leave Factory
Plan real usage costs
Factory starts at $20, but usage allowances need confirmation. Compare each vendor’s limits and billing terms against your agent workload before committing.
Verify integration requirements
Factory’s integration details need confirmation. Check API and SDK support, repository workflows and CI fit before replacing it in a production stack.
Choose the deployment model
Factory is self-hostable, but teams may prefer a different runner or agent workflow. Confirm deployment options, data export and model choice with each vendor.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- GitHub-centric teams
GitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotChoose GitHub Copilot when your team already works through GitHub issues and pull requests and wants agent sessions across surfaces. Its GitHub-native workflow can make it a closer fit than Factory for teams that review changes inside GitHub. It starts at $10 with a free plan; budget around usage credits and changing model limits, and verify API and SDK needs before migrating.
Trade-off: Usage credits and changing model limits complicate cost planning.
7.8/10from
$10/mofree plan - IDE and CLI workflows
CursorCursorCursor suits developers who want agent workflows in an IDE and CLI, with bounded tasks and pull requests that teammates can review. It starts at $8 with a free plan, below Factory’s $20 starting price. That does not establish lower costs at production usage: check the usage terms and confirm how Cursor fits your repository, review and automation workflows.
Trade-off: You need to review generated code and manage usage.
6.8/10from
$8/mofree plan - Persistent agent workflows
AmpAmpAmp is a fit for teams that want persistent agents, shared agent threads and workflows, or projects using their own runners. Those runner options are relevant if your setup depends on how agent work executes. Amp starts at $20 with a free plan, the same starting price as Factory; check pricing and usage allowances before scaling, and confirm API and SDK requirements.
Trade-off: Pricing and usage need checking before scaling.
7.1/10from
$20/mofree plan - Repository-based automation
Claude CodeClaude CodeClaude Code fits developers working in existing repositories and teams automating issue-to-PR workflows, including long-running refactors and migrations. It offers broad entry points, which may suit teams looking to fit an agent into more than one workflow. It starts at $17 with a free plan; plan around subscription usage limits and verify integration requirements before replacing Factory.
Trade-off: Subscription usage limits need planning.
7.5/10from
$17/mofree plan - Spec-first development
KiroKiroKiro is a candidate for teams that want to work from written specs, automate PR review in CI/CD or choose among models. Its self-hosting option may matter when deployment control is part of the replacement decision. Kiro starts at $20 with a free plan. Check how its credit meter behaves at your workload and confirm the API and SDK support your stack needs.
Trade-off: The credit meter adds another usage limit to track.
7.0/10from
$20/mofree plan - Scoped repository tasks
DevinDevinDevin targets scoped repository tasks, Slack- or Teams-based engineering support and routine CI fixes. It offers cloud and local agent options and a PR workflow, which gives teams more than one deployment path to evaluate against Factory. Devin starts at $20 with a free plan. Public details on APIs and production limits are limited, so ask the vendor before designing an integration.
Trade-off: Public API and production-limit details are limited.
6.8/10from
$20/mofree plan - Large codebases
CodyCodyCody is aimed at enterprise teams with many repositories, agents that need codebase context and large coordinated changes. It is self-hostable, making it worth evaluating when deployment control matters. Its $16K annual minimum rules it out for many small projects, so compare that commitment with your expected usage and ask the vendor about API, SDK and migration requirements.
Trade-off: The $16K annual minimum is a high entry cost.
7.0/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Factory Factory (current) | 7.0 | $20/mo | No | Engineering teams adopting coding agents |
| GitHub Copilot GitHub Copilot | 7.8 | $10/mo | Yes | Teams already using GitHub issues and pull requests |
| Cursor Cursor | 6.8 | $8/mo | Yes | Developers delegating bounded coding tasks |
| Amp Amp | 7.1 | $20/mo | Yes | Developers who want persistent agents |
| Claude Code Claude Code | 7.5 | $17/mo | Yes | Developers working in existing repositories |
| Kiro Kiro | 7.0 | $20/mo | Yes | Developers who work from written specs |
| Devin Devin | 6.8 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams delegating scoped repository tasks |
| Cody Cody | 7.0 | Custom | No | Enterprise teams with many repositories |
Questions people ask
Which Factory alternative has the lowest starting price?
Cursor has the lowest listed starting price among these picks at $8, with a free plan. GitHub Copilot starts at $10, and Claude Code at $17; each also has a free plan. Starting prices do not show what a team will pay at its actual usage, so compare limits and billing terms.
Which Factory alternatives can be self-hosted?
Factory, Cody and Kiro are listed as self-hostable among the products covered here. That label does not establish the deployment requirements, available controls or data-export options. Ask each vendor how self-hosting works and confirm whether the setup supports your security and operations requirements.
What should we check before switching from Factory?
Confirm API and SDK support, usage limits, pricing at your expected workload, data export and compatibility with repository review and CI workflows. For Devin, public details on APIs and production limits are limited. For Amp, check pricing and usage before scaling; for Cody, account for its $16K annual minimum.