We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Devin is a cloud and local coding agent built around delegated repository work and a pull-request workflow. Developers considering a switch cite usage limits and interest in working directly with tools such as Claude or ChatGPT; those are user reports, not universal assessments. The alternatives below cover GitHub-native agents, editor and CLI workflows, model routing and on-premise options. Their listed starting prices are not a measure of cost at sustained usage, so check usage rules, API access and deployment terms before migrating.
01Why people leave Devin
Usage limits can interrupt work
A Reddit user reported exhausting Devin's daily and weekly allowances after a few prompts, leaving them unable to continue until limits reset.
Some prefer direct model workflows
In one Reddit thread, commenters said they found coding with Claude or ChatGPT more convenient than waiting for Devin to reach the market.
Free model access may change
A Devin subscriber questioned whether SWE 2 would remain free and said losing that option could make the plan difficult to use for development.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Best for GitHub teams
GitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotGitHub Copilot fits teams already handling issues and pull requests in GitHub, with agent sessions across surfaces and change review inside GitHub. It starts at $10 and has a free plan; usage credits and changing model limits affect real cost. Check the API and SDK coverage, licence terms and any migration work for your existing issue-to-PR workflow before switching.
Trade-off: Usage credits and model limits can change, so the entry price does not predict sustained usage cost.
7.8/10from
$10/mofree plan - Best for repo workflows
Claude CodeClaude CodeClaude Code is a candidate for developers working in existing repositories or automating issue-to-PR work, including long-running refactors and migrations. It starts at $17 and has a free plan, but subscription usage limits need planning. Confirm API and SDK options, the applicable licence and usage rules, and how your current Devin tasks translate to Claude Code's entry points.
Trade-off: Subscription usage limits need planning for long-running work.
7.5/10from
$17/mofree plan - Best for editor and CLI
CursorCursorCursor suits developers who want both editor and CLI workflows, plus delegated implementation tasks and GitHub-based review. It starts at $8 and has a free plan. The listed model costs and review work can affect total cost; check API and SDK access, licence terms and the effort to move repository tasks and review habits from Devin.
Trade-off: Model costs and the work required to review changes can add to the listed price.
6.8/10from
$8/mofree plan - Best for on-premise options
FactoryFactoryFactory offers coding agents across desktop, terminal, web and CLI, with model routing and on-premise options for enterprise teams. It starts at $20 per month. For a Devin replacement, ask the vendor about API and SDK support, which components can run on-premise, licence terms and usage charges at your expected task volume before moving workflows.
Trade-off: Confirm deployment scope, integration details and production costs before committing.
7.0/10from
$20/mo - Best for shared agent work
AmpAmpAmp is aimed at long-lived agent tasks, shared team threads and workflows, and projects using self-hosted orbs. It starts at $20 and has a free plan. Before moving Devin tasks, ask about API and SDK support, orb operations, licence terms and usage pricing at your expected volume; the integration and operating details matter to a production rollout.
Trade-off: Key integration and operating details need confirmation before adoption.
7.1/10from
$20/mofree plan - Best for spec-first workflows
KiroKiroKiro is a structured AI coding IDE and CLI for teams that want spec-first development, AWS-oriented Terraform work, or CI checks that review and fix pull requests. It starts at $20 and has a free plan. Verify API and SDK options, usage terms, licence and deployment choices, then scope the migration of Devin's task and review workflows.
Trade-off: Reported workflow and reliability frustrations make a production pilot prudent.
7.0/10from
$20/mofree plan - Best for large codebases
CodyCodyCody targets enterprise teams working across many repositories, with codebase context and agent tools for coordinating large changes. Its listed starting price is n/a, and the Enterprise minimum is described as steep, so request a quote for your usage. Confirm API and SDK coverage, licence and deployment terms, and how repository context transfers from Devin.
Trade-off: The Enterprise minimum is a steep entry point, and pricing needs confirmation.
7.0/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Devin Devin (current) | 6.8 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams delegating scoped repository tasks |
| GitHub Copilot GitHub Copilot | 7.8 | $10/mo | Yes | Teams already using GitHub issues and pull requests |
| Claude Code Claude Code | 7.5 | $17/mo | Yes | Developers working in existing repositories |
| Cursor Cursor | 6.8 | $8/mo | Yes | Developers delegating bounded coding tasks |
| Factory Factory | 7.0 | $20/mo | No | Engineering teams adopting coding agents |
| Amp Amp | 7.1 | $20/mo | Yes | Developers who want persistent agents |
| Kiro Kiro | 7.0 | $20/mo | Yes | Developers who work from written specs |
| Cody Cody | 7.0 | Custom | No | Enterprise teams with many repositories |
Questions people ask
Which Devin alternative is cheapest?
Among these options, Cursor has the lowest listed starting price at $8 and a free plan. GitHub Copilot starts at $10, Claude Code at $17, and Amp and Kiro at $20. Those entry prices do not show the cost of sustained use; check each vendor's usage rules and limits.
Is there an open-source Devin alternative?
The listed alternatives do not establish an open-source licence. Factory is positioned with on-premise options, but on-premise deployment is not the same as an open-source release. If source availability or self-hosting is a requirement, ask vendors for the licence, deployable components and data-export terms before migrating.
Which alternative has the best API and fewer limits?
The available product descriptions do not support a definitive API or limit comparison. Devin has limited public detail on APIs and production limits; alternatives also require vendor confirmation. Ask for API and SDK documentation, rate limits, usage caps, model availability, data export and the process for handling a limit in production.