We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
TestComplete is a low-code UI automation tool for web, mobile and desktop testing. Reddit users cite its license cost and the maintenance burden of record-and-replay tests as reasons to look elsewhere; one commenter also warns that teams using DevXpress controls may have few alternatives. The picks below serve different parts of a testing stack, from hosted browser and device access to Storybook visual checks and local AWS emulation. Compare their scope before treating any one as a drop-in replacement.
01Why people leave TestComplete
License cost adds up
The listed TestComplete starting price is $299.83. Reddit users looking for desktop UI automation describe it as extremely expensive.
Recorded tests need upkeep
Reddit commenters warn that record-and-replay suites can become flaky when applications change, creating ongoing test maintenance.
Your stack may constrain migration
A Reddit commenter says TestComplete may be the only workable option for DevXpress controls; check control support before switching.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Browser and device coverage
BrowserStackBrowserStackBrowserStack is a hosted option for teams that need testing across browsers and real mobile devices, rather than a low-code desktop automation replacement. The pricing page lists a free plan and a $29 starting price. Its broad browser and device coverage may fit teams combining manual and automated checks. Before migrating, ask about supported automation protocols, API access and usage limits.
Trade-off: Hosted coverage does not replace TestComplete’s low-code desktop workflow.
7.0/10from
$29/mofree plan - Mobile workflows and APIs
AppetizeAppetizeAppetize puts cloud iOS simulators and Android emulators behind a browser, CLI and REST API, giving developers more direct integration points for mobile workflows. The listing calls it self-hostable and the pricing page lists a free plan with a $59 starting price. Confirm what self-hosting includes and how its usage is priced before moving mobile tests.
Trade-off: Its stated focus is mobile, not broad desktop UI automation.
7.2/10from
$59/mofree plan - Storybook UI reviews
ChromaticChromaticChromatic is a hosted testing and review layer for teams already using Storybook. It adds UI checks to CI workflows, including visual and accessibility checks, making it a fit for component-level review rather than general desktop automation. The pricing page lists a free plan and a $179 starting price; check plan limits against your CI volume.
Trade-off: It is tied to Storybook workflows, not a general-purpose UI automation suite.
7.8/10from
$179/mofree plan - Local AWS integration tests
LocalStackLocalStackLocalStack emulates cloud services locally for teams testing AWS integrations and running cloud tests in CI. It is listed as self-hostable, with a free plan and a $39 starting price. Developers can use it to cover infrastructure-dependent test cases without treating it as a replacement for TestComplete’s web, mobile or desktop UI automation.
Trade-off: AWS emulation does not automate application interfaces; verify service coverage and parity.
7.1/10from
$39/mofree plan - Selenium and Appium teams
Sauce LabsSauce LabsSauce Labs combines hosted browser and device testing with AI-assisted test authoring and analysis. It is aimed at teams using Selenium or Appium and consolidating testing tools. The pricing page lists a $39 starting price; compare the plan’s device access and usage allowances with your current workload before moving tests.
Trade-off: Hosted testing brings plan and usage constraints to confirm with the vendor.
7.0/10from
$39/mo - Manual browser checks
BrowserlingBrowserlingBrowserling provides hosted browser access for manual cross-browser checks, remote mobile browsers and isolated suspicious-link inspection. The pricing page lists a free plan and a $9 starting price. It may suit teams needing occasional remote checks, but confirm its automation and API capabilities before considering it for a CI-driven TestComplete replacement.
Trade-off: Its stated strengths are hosted access and manual checks, not broad automation.
6.5/10from
$9/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 TestComplete TestComplete (current) | 5.8 | $299.83/mo | No | QA teams seeking low-code automation |
| BrowserStack BrowserStack | 7.0 | $29/mo | Yes | Teams testing across many browsers |
| Appetize Appetize | 7.2 | $59/mo | Yes | Teams sharing mobile builds |
| Chromatic Chromatic | 7.8 | $179/mo | Yes | Teams already using Storybook |
| LocalStack LocalStack | 7.1 | $39/mo | Yes | Teams testing AWS integrations locally |
| Sauce Labs Sauce Labs | 7.0 | $39/mo | No | Teams testing mobile apps on real devices |
| Browserling Browserling | 6.5 | $9/mo | Yes | Manual cross-browser checks |
Questions people ask
Which TestComplete alternative is closest for automated testing?
It depends on what TestComplete covers in your stack. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs offer hosted browser and device testing; Appetize focuses on cloud mobile simulators and emulators. LocalStack targets AWS integration tests, while Chromatic covers Storybook UI checks. Check supported platforms and automation interfaces before planning a migration.
Are these alternatives cheaper than TestComplete?
Their listed starting prices are lower than TestComplete’s $299.83 starting price: Browserling $9, BrowserStack $29, LocalStack $39, Sauce Labs $39, Appetize $59 and Chromatic $179. Several list free plans. Starting prices alone do not establish total cost; compare plan limits and expected usage with each vendor.
Which alternatives are open source or self-hostable?
Appetize and LocalStack are listed as self-hostable. That does not establish that either is open source or specify its license. Confirm licensing, deployment requirements, support and data export with the vendor before choosing a self-hosted option; do not assume self-hosting removes usage costs or lock-in.