We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
ReSharper is a Visual Studio add-on, so replacing it can mean either switching IDEs or giving up its extra tooling inside Visual Studio. JetBrains Rider is the closest option here for .NET work; Visual Studio alone keeps you in the same environment. Free editors and self-hosted workspaces fit different goals, but they are not drop-in replacements for ReSharper’s refactoring and test runner. We compare six options by fit, published starting price and what changes when you migrate.
01Why people leave ReSharper
Visual Studio performance
One r/csharp thread reports ReSharper slowing Visual Studio, especially on large projects. A commenter attributes this to running two compilers; that is their explanation, not a vendor statement.
Test discovery and .NET support
A developer in the same thread reports ReSharper stopped discovering tests after a project moved to multi-target .NET Core.
License value
Some developers question whether ReSharper’s features justify its license when Visual Studio already covers parts of their workflow.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Best for .NET
JetBrains RiderJetBrains RiderRider is the closest IDE replacement for developers who want to leave Visual Studio without leaving .NET: it is a full IDE for .NET and game development. The listed starting price is $14.08, with a free non-commercial plan and paid commercial licenses. Expect to reconfigure project workflows when moving IDEs; one Reddit commenter says large projects with automated processes can take time to set up.
Trade-off: You change IDEs, and commercial use requires a paid license.
7.6/10from
$14.08/mofree plan - Best for staying put
Visual StudioVisual StudioVisual Studio lets Windows-based .NET teams remove ReSharper without changing IDEs. Its Community edition is free, and paid team subscriptions are listed from $45. That can make it a lower-cost path for teams that do not need ReSharper’s additions, but Reddit developers disagree about how much functionality Visual Studio alone provides.
Trade-off: You may give up ReSharper features such as its test runner and refactorings.
8.2/10from
$45/mofree plan - Best free editor
Visual Studio CodeVisual Studio CodeVisual Studio Code is a free editor for three desktop platforms, with language support published through extensions. It is an option if you want to replace a paid IDE add-on with an extension-based editor workflow. The editor has no listed starting price, but you will need to choose extensions for the languages and tasks your codebase requires.
Trade-off: It is an extension-based editor, not a ReSharper-equivalent .NET IDE.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - Best focused editor
Sublime TextSublime TextSublime Text suits developers who want a focused desktop editor rather than another full IDE. Its listed starting price is $5.42, and the product has a Python plugin API and no usage-based bill. Consider it if your priority is a simpler editing environment; the published product details do not establish parity with ReSharper’s .NET refactoring or test tools.
Trade-off: The listed plugin API is for Python, not a stated .NET replacement.
7.8/10from
$5.42/mo - Best open-source option
ZedZedZed is an open-source collaborative IDE with a free plan and a listed starting price of $10. It may suit developers who want an open-source editor and bring their own AI keys. That changes the licensing and AI setup, but the product is not presented as a .NET-specific IDE, so check language support and extensions against your codebase.
Trade-off: Its extension ecosystem is smaller, and hosted AI has separate charges.
7.8/10from
$10/mofree plan - Best for self-hosted workspaces
CoderCoderCoder is not a ReSharper plugin or IDE: it puts development workspaces and AI agents on infrastructure your organization controls. Choose it if the goal is to standardize or self-host development environments, not to preserve ReSharper’s refactorings. It is listed as self-hostable, with no starting price listed.
Trade-off: It changes where workspaces run; it does not replace IDE features.
6.8/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.5 | $12.42/mo | Yes | Visual Studio developers who want refactoring | |
| 7.6 | $14.08/mo | Yes | .NET developers who want an integrated IDE | |
| 8.2 | $45/mo | Yes | .NET teams on Windows | |
| 7.6 | Free | Yes | JavaScript and web developers | |
| 7.8 | $5.42/mo | No | Developers who prefer a focused editor | |
| 7.8 | $10/mo | Yes | Developers bringing their own AI keys | |
| 6.8 | Free | Yes | Teams standardizing self-hosted workspaces |
Questions people ask
Can I replace ReSharper without leaving Visual Studio?
Yes. You can use Visual Studio without ReSharper, and its Community edition is free. The tradeoff is functionality: developers on r/csharp report that Visual Studio alone lacks features they value in ReSharper, including refactoring and test-runner capabilities. Check your team’s required workflows before removing the add-on.
Which ReSharper alternative is best for .NET?
Rider is the closest match in this list because it is a full IDE for .NET and game development. Visual Studio is another direct option for Windows .NET teams that want to stay in their current IDE. Rider lists a free non-commercial plan and paid commercial licenses from $14.08; Visual Studio lists a free Community edition.
Is there an open-source ReSharper alternative?
Zed is listed as open source, but it is not described as a ReSharper-equivalent .NET tool. Coder is self-hostable, but it manages workspaces and AI agents rather than replacing IDE refactoring features. Check language support, extensions and your team’s required tooling before choosing either.
