We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Phyllo is a hosted API for consented creator data across social platforms. Its custom pricing makes it difficult to estimate costs before talking to the vendor. The alternatives below range from social-data APIs to web-scraping platforms, so they are not interchangeable: public-data collection is not the same as consented creator data. Compare platform coverage, pricing at your expected volume, and how your application handles permissions before replacing Phyllo.
01Why people leave Phyllo
Hard to estimate spend
Phyllo uses custom pricing, making it harder to compare costs with alternatives that list starting prices or usage-based models.
Need a different data model
Teams seeking public social data or scraping workflows may prefer APIs built around those collection methods rather than consented creator data.
Want clearer usage economics
Listed starting prices and credit or unit-based pricing can make initial comparisons easier, though actual costs depend on usage and limits.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Multi-platform social data
ScrapeCreatorsScrapeCreatorsScrapeCreators is a hosted API option for apps that need data from several social platforms. Its free plan and non-expiring credits suit variable or exploratory workloads, rather than requiring a subscription as the starting point. A migration still means mapping Phyllo's consented creator-data workflows to ScrapeCreators' social-data APIs and checking whether its platform coverage matches your use case.
Trade-off: Credit costs and platform coverage need checking against your production workload.
7.4/10from
Freefree plan - REST social pipelines
EnsembleDataEnsembleDataEnsembleData offers a hosted REST API for public social data and several platform APIs, making it a candidate for JSON-based pipelines. Its pricing starts at $100 per month, with a free plan, and is based on daily units. Switching from Phyllo means validating the available endpoints and adapting your integration to public-data collection rather than assuming consented creator records transfer directly.
Trade-off: Daily-unit pricing and endpoint coverage need validation before migration.
6.8/10from
$100/mofree plan - Public X data
TwitterAPI.ioTwitterAPI.ioFor a product that only needs public X data, TwitterAPI.io offers a narrower replacement than Phyllo's broad social coverage. The service has a free plan, and it is described as a low-cost hosted API for variable-volume search and profile workloads. Developers can also evaluate it for AI agents using an MCP client, but should check rate limits and service terms before switching.
Trade-off: It focuses on X, not broad creator-data coverage.
7.8/10from
Freefree plan - Custom scraping workflows
ApifyApifyApify is a hosted Actor platform for teams that want ready-made web scrapers or to build custom Actors. Its listed starting price is $19 with a free plan. That makes it worth considering when replacing Phyllo with a scraping workflow, but migration involves building around Actors and planning for usage costs and concurrency limits, rather than simply swapping API credentials.
Trade-off: Usage costs and concurrency limits require capacity planning.
7.7/10from
$19/mofree plan - Multi-network social data
Data365Data365Data365 provides a hosted API for public social data and multi-network analytics projects. Its listed starting price is $300, so compare expected usage and credit costs before treating it as a less expensive alternative to custom-priced Phyllo. It may fit teams focused on social listening or brand monitoring, but replacing consented creator data requires checking network coverage and the data your product depends on.
Trade-off: The $300 starting price may not suit smaller workloads.
6.0/10from
€300/mo - Combined API workloads
YepAPIYepAPIYepAPI combines SEO, scraping, social, and e-commerce data APIs with 285 AI models in one usage-billed service. It can suit an application already making HTTP API calls that wants to consolidate several data needs. Its listed starting price is n/a, so estimate spend from your expected calls before comparing it with Phyllo's custom pricing or committing your integration to the service.
Trade-off: Confirm usage costs and social-data coverage for your target platforms.
7.2/10from
Custom - Shopify creator programs
ModashModashModash is a Shopify-centered creator program tool for brands managing campaigns, gifting, and affiliates. Its listed price starts at $199, and it is also an option for builders evaluating creator-data APIs. Consider it when your product needs that commerce-focused workflow; before replacing Phyllo, verify API costs and whether creator data covers the markets your application serves.
Trade-off: Shopify focus and API costs may not fit broader products.
7.0/10from
$199/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Phyllo Phyllo (current) | 6.4 | Custom | No | Creator analytics product teams |
| ScrapeCreators ScrapeCreators | 7.4 | Free | Yes | Apps needing several social platforms |
| EnsembleData EnsembleData | 6.8 | $100/mo | Yes | JSON-based social data pipelines |
| TwitterAPI.io TwitterAPI.io | 7.8 | Free | Yes | Apps that need public X data |
| Apify Apify | 7.7 | $19/mo | Yes | Teams needing ready-made web scrapers |
| Data365 Data365 | 6.0 | €300/mo | No | Social listening and brand monitoring |
| YepAPI YepAPI | 7.2 | Custom | No | Apps combining SEO and AI features |
| Modash Modash | 7.0 | $199/mo | No | Shopify brands running creator campaigns |
Questions people ask
Which Phyllo alternative is closest for social data?
ScrapeCreators and EnsembleData are hosted options for social data across several platforms. Their focus is public social data, while Phyllo is described as providing consented creator data. Compare the source and permissions behind the records your product needs; similar platform coverage does not make the data models equivalent.
Which Phyllo alternative has the lowest listed starting price?
Apify lists a $19 starting price and a free plan. PhantomBuster lists $56, EnsembleData lists $100 with a free plan, Modash lists $199, and Data365 lists $300. These are starting prices, not equivalent quotes: compare included usage, limits, and your expected workload before estimating production cost.
Are these Phyllo alternatives open source or self-hosted?
The alternatives described here are hosted services or platforms; no open-source licence or self-hosting option is established for them. If running the collection stack yourself is a requirement, ask each vendor about deployment, data export, and licence terms before migrating. Do not assume that replacing an API removes vendor dependency.