We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick Cursor.
For developers choosing a coding assistant now, Cursor is the more direct fit: it offers a desktop app, CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows, and agents that plan, write, test and demo code. Gemini Code Assist consumer requests stopped on June 18, 2026, including IDE extensions and Gemini CLI. Standard and Enterprise subscriptions have a separate deprecation schedule, so teams considering those plans should confirm their status and timeline with Google before adopting them.
01Side by side
| Gemini Code Assist | Cursor | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free individual tier; paid Standard and Enterprise plans | Free plan; monthly individual and per-seat team tiers |
| Free tier | Consumer requests stopped June 18, 2026 | Limited agent and chat requests |
| CLI and docs | Gemini CLI; migration guide to Antigravity CLI | Cursor CLI; installed with a curl command |
| Integrations | IDE extensions and Gemini CLI | Slack, GitHub, terminal, and multiple model providers |
| Deployment model | Consumer IDE and CLI requests ended; paid schedule separate | Desktop app, CLI, and parallel cloud agents |
| Platforms | IDE extensions and CLI | macOS, web, CLI, and Slack |
| Limits and scaling | Standard: 1,500 model requests/user/day; 2 requests/second | Usage multipliers by tier; top-offs available |
| Lock-in and portability | Consumer users can migrate to Antigravity | Choose among multiple model providers |
Gemini Code Assist Choose Gemini Code Assist if
- Choose Gemini Code Assist if your team has a Standard or Enterprise subscription and has confirmed its deprecation timeline.
- Choose Gemini Code Assist if its published Standard or Enterprise request limits fit your workload.
- Choose Gemini Code Assist if you need the documented consumer migration path to Antigravity.
Cursor Choose Cursor if
- Choose Cursor if you want agents to plan, write, test, and demo code.
- Choose Cursor if Slack or GitHub workflows are part of your coding process.
- Choose Cursor if you want to select among multiple model providers.
02Pricing at real usage
Gemini Code Assist for individuals is listed at $0 per month, but consumer requests for its IDE extensions and Gemini CLI stopped on June 18, 2026. Standard is listed at $19 per user per month with an annual commitment or $22.8 month to month. Enterprise is $45 with an annual commitment or $54 month to month, with a 10-license minimum. Standard includes 1,500 model requests per user per day and a 2-request-per-second interactive limit; Enterprise lists 2,000 requests and the same interactive limit.
Cursor lists a free plan with limited agent and chat requests. Its monthly individual tiers are Plus at $8, Premium at $30, Super at $100, and Ultra at $200. Teams starts at $30 per user per month. Cursor also lists usage top-offs; third-party models are billed separately at API list price. Its pricing page does not list an annual discount.
03API, SDKs and integration
Gemini Code Assist is presented as IDE extensions plus Gemini CLI, with documentation for consumer accounts, deprecations, and migration to Antigravity CLI. Google’s consumer-account page says requests through both the IDE extensions and CLI stopped on June 18, 2026. It does not name specific IDE integrations on the homepage. Cursor offers a desktop app and CLI, and its homepage describes workflows that connect to Slack, GitHub, and the terminal. It also lists model selection from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, SpaceXAI, and Cursor’s Composer.
Neither product’s homepage describes a general-purpose coding API or SDKs, so teams building their own integrations should confirm available interfaces with the vendor. Cursor says its CLI is installed with a curl command. Google directs Antigravity CLI support questions to its GitHub repository. Cursor’s listed workflows include tagging an agent in Slack and opening or reviewing GitHub pull requests.
04Open source, self-hosting and lock-in
Google’s Gemini Code Assist documentation page says its page content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 and its code samples under Apache 2.0; those notices do not establish an open-source license for the product itself. Neither vendor publishes self-hosting or data-export options for these products, so ask about deployment boundaries and how to retrieve codebase context or other stored data before committing.
For consumer Gemini Code Assist accounts, Google documents migration to the Antigravity family of products, including a migration guide for Antigravity CLI. Standard and Enterprise subscriptions follow a separate deprecation schedule, so teams should confirm their migration options. Cursor lets developers choose among several model providers, which gives flexibility at the model layer; that does not establish that agent history, settings, or other product data can be exported.
Questions people ask
Is Gemini Code Assist still available for individual developers?
Google says consumer-tier requests through Gemini Code Assist IDE extensions and Gemini CLI stopped on June 18, 2026. Consumer users can migrate to the Antigravity family of products. Google says Standard and Enterprise subscriptions have a separate deprecation schedule.
Which tool is better for autonomous coding agents?
Cursor’s homepage describes agents that plan, write, test, and demo features for review, plus cloud agents that can run in parallel. Gemini Code Assist is described through IDE extensions and CLI; the consumer versions of those surfaces have stopped serving requests.
Can Cursor use models from more than one provider?
Yes. Cursor lists model choices from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, SpaceXAI, and its own Composer. Its pricing information says third-party models are billed separately at API list price, so teams should account for that cost alongside the Cursor plan.
What should a team check before buying Gemini Code Assist?
Confirm whether the intended Standard or Enterprise subscription is affected by Google’s separate deprecation schedule. Then compare its per-user request limits and interactive rate limit with your workload, and ask Google about migration and data retrieval requirements.