programcode

Head-to-head · Agent builders

Composio vs Lindy

Composio is an agent integration layer with self-hosting and action records; Lindy packages business workflows into a per-user, credit-based service.

Composio

6.8/10
VS

Lindy

6.5/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

It's a split decision.

Choose Composio when you are building an agent into a codebase and need broad app access, per-action permissions, an MCP entry point, and CSV-exportable action records. Its self-hosting option also matters if deployment control is part of your architecture. Choose Lindy when the goal is to delegate business workflows—such as lead replies, reporting, and invoice follow-up—through Slack, email, text, calendar, or browser. Its pricing is per active user, with pooled credits.

01Side by side

ComposioLindy
Pricing model$29/month Pro, credits and usage chargesPer-user monthly tiers with pooled credits
Free tierHobby: 100,000 tool calls monthly$50 credits; they last 7 days
Self-hostingSelf-hosting availableSelf-hosting option not published
Integrations1,500+ apps1,500+ integrations
PlatformsWebSlack, email, text, calendar, browser
Limits and scalingPro includes 10,000 API requests per minuteTeam credit tiers; active users billed
Lock-in and data exportAction records can export to CSVExport options not published
API and SDKsMCP URL for any MCP clientMCP support listed

Choose Composio if

  • Choose Composio if you need app connections inside an agent architecture.
  • Choose Composio if per-action permissions and action records matter.
  • Choose Composio if self-hosting is a deployment requirement.

Choose Lindy if

  • Choose Lindy if you want business workflows delegated across work channels.
  • Choose Lindy if per-user credit pools fit your team’s billing model.
  • Choose Lindy if approvals for actions affecting others are important.

02Pricing at real usage

Composio’s free Hobby plan costs $0 per month and includes 100,000 tool calls, 50,000 trigger events, three team members, one million Sandbox LLM tokens, and $2 in credits monthly. Pro is $29 per month, with $29 in monthly credits, 20,000 managed-app tool calls, 10,000 managed-app trigger events, and a listed limit of 10,000 API requests per minute. After included usage, some charges are credit-based; for example, tool calls cost $0.0003 credits each. Lindy’s free plan gives $50 in credits that last seven days. Team starts at $29.99 per active user monthly for 3,000 credits, with higher credit tiers available; team credits are pooled. Credit top-ups cost $10 per 1,000. Compare expected workflow usage before choosing: Composio’s tool-call rates vary by app, while a Lindy workflow’s credit consumption depends on the task.

03API, SDKs and integration

Composio is an integration layer for AI agents: it connects to more than 1,500 apps, including Gmail, Slack, GitHub, Notion, and Salesforce. Its homepage offers an MCP URL for any MCP client and install paths for tools such as Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Cursor, and Grok. Its features include per-action permissions and records of the user, tool, and outcome, with CSV export. Lindy lists more than 1,500 integrations and MCP support. Rather than presenting itself mainly as an agent integration layer, Lindy describes workflows for lead finding, client reporting, invoice follow-up, and lead replies, carried out through Slack, email, text, calendar, and browser. Neither vendor publishes SDK language coverage or detailed API-reference information on the pages reviewed, so check the documentation for implementation-specific requirements before committing. The key distinction is control over agent connections versus a packaged business workflow.

04Open source, self-hosting and lock-in

Composio lists self-hosting as available. Lindy’s listed experience centers on business channels, and its pages do not publish a self-hosting option. Neither vendor publishes an open-source licence or project status, so confirm those points directly if licence obligations affect your stack. Composio records the user, tool, and outcome for actions and supports CSV export of those records. That helps with audit history and analysis, but it does not establish that connected-account credentials, configuration, or the full workspace can be exported in a portable format. Lindy describes business context that updates from calls, emails, and corrections, but does not publish data-export details. Before adopting either product, ask about full data export, deletion, credential ownership, and what remains portable if you replace the service.

Questions people ask

Which is better for developers building AI agents?

Composio is the closer fit when your code needs to connect agents to apps, set action permissions, and retain action records. It also lists an MCP URL for any MCP client and self-hosting. Lindy is better suited to delegating defined business workflows through work channels than to acting as a general-purpose app integration layer.

Can you self-host Composio or Lindy?

Composio is listed as self-hostable. Lindy’s product pages do not publish a self-hosting option. If deployment location, network boundaries, or data residency are requirements, confirm the available deployment arrangements with Lindy before building around it.

Which product costs less?

There is no direct like-for-like price comparison: Composio charges through plan credits and usage-based charges, while Lindy’s Team plan is priced per active user with pooled credits. Composio Hobby includes monthly tool-call and trigger-event allowances; Lindy’s free credits expire after seven days. Estimate usage against each product’s billing unit.

Do Composio and Lindy support MCP?

Yes. Composio’s homepage offers an MCP URL for any MCP client, and Lindy lists MCP support. The published product pages do not detail SDK languages or API-reference coverage, so verify supported operations, authentication, and client requirements in the documentation before choosing an integration path.