We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Augment Code is a team-level agent orchestration platform: Cosmos runs workflows from ticket to review, deploy and monitoring, with engineers approving work at checkpoints. Claude Code is a coding assistant for tasks such as bugs, tests and migrations, steered from terminals, IDEs and remote clients. Choose Augment when you need reusable workflows across repositories and SDLC stages. Choose Claude Code for individual or team coding work across a wider set of entry points and subscription plans.
01Side by side
| Augment Code | Claude Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat team plans with included usage; pay-as-you-go top-ups. | Individual and per-seat plans; Enterprise usage billed at API rates. |
| Free tier | No free plan listed. | Free plan excludes Claude Code. |
| Self-hosting | Self-hostable. | Vendor doesn't publish a self-hosting option. |
| CLI and docs | CLI access, MCP, Native Tools and product documentation. | Terminal CLI, documentation and editor extensions. |
| Integrations | GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira, schedules and webhooks. | GitHub, GitLab, CLI, editors, desktop and Slack. |
| Deployment model | Cosmos orchestrates agent workflows across the SDLC. | Coding assistant spans local and remote clients. |
| Platforms | Web. | macOS, Linux, Windows, terminal, web, mobile and more. |
| Limits and scaling | 50 seats and sessions on paid plans; Enterprise is unlimited. | Plan-based usage limits; Team plans support 2–150 users. |
Augment Code Choose Augment Code if
- Choose Augment Code if you need repeatable agents across SDLC stages.
- Choose Augment Code if teams need pooled usage across up to 50 seats.
- Choose Augment Code if you need self-hosting and workflow triggers.
Claude Code Choose Claude Code if
- Choose Claude Code if you want a coding assistant across editors and clients.
- Choose Claude Code if you need individual plans with different usage levels.
- Choose Claude Code if your team works through GitHub, GitLab, Slack or a CLI.
02Pricing at real usage
Augment's Standard plan is $20 per month per team, with $20 of usage across LLM, Context Engine and compute. Business is $100 per month per team and includes $100 of usage. Both cover up to 50 seats and 50 concurrent sessions. Usage top-ups are pay-as-you-go, valid for 12 months, and carry a 40% service fee on LLM usage; compute has no fee. Enterprise pricing is custom. Claude Code's Free plan has limited usage every five hours and weekly, but does not include Claude Code. Pro is $20 monthly or $17 per month with annual billing. Max is $100 monthly and Ultra is $200. Team Standard is $25 monthly or $20 annually per seat; Premium is $125 or $100. Enterprise requires 20 seats and adds API-rate usage to annual seat billing. Claude usage scales with plan limits and, for Enterprise, model and task.
03API, SDKs and integration
Augment is built around Cosmos workflows, not just an editor assistant. Its product pages list CLI access, MCP and Native Tools, with native triggers for GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira and schedules. Typed webhooks connect other tools. The Context Engine supplies codebase context across organizational repositories, while the Expert Registry supports prebuilt or custom agent templates with their own environment and memory. Claude Code is a coding assistant that works through its terminal interface, command-line tools, GitHub, GitLab, VS Code, Cursor, Devin Desktop, JetBrains and Slack. Its docs link from the product page, which also lists web, iOS and Android access. Neither product page specifies language-specific SDKs or public API endpoints; Augment does name MCP, while Claude's listed integration paths are clients and development tools. Choose based on whether you need workflow orchestration or a coding agent in your existing tools.
04Open source, self-hosting and lock-in
Augment states that Cosmos is self-hostable; Claude's product page does not specify a self-hosting option. Neither vendor publishes open-source licence details or data-export guarantees on these product pages. That makes export and exit planning a procurement question, not something to assume from the integration list. Before adopting either, ask how agent instructions, workflow definitions, repository context, logs and generated changes can be exported, and whether those artifacts remain usable outside the product. Augment's triggers and typed webhooks provide integration points, but they do not establish that workflow state is portable. Claude Code's support for command-line tools and multiple clients gives developers several ways to steer it, but does not establish that configuration or history can be migrated. Confirm data retention, export formats and deletion terms with the vendor.
Questions people ask
Is Augment Code or Claude Code better for a whole engineering team?
Augment Code is designed to coordinate agents across SDLC workflows, with engineers approving work at defined checkpoints. Claude Code is a coding assistant for bugs, tests and migrations, available across terminals, IDEs and remote clients. Pick based on whether you need workflow orchestration or individual coding assistance.
Does Claude Code have a free plan?
Claude's Free plan has limited usage every five hours and weekly, but does not include Claude Code. The Pro plan includes Claude Code and costs $20 per month or $17 per month with annual billing. Augment lists no free plan.
Can Augment Code be self-hosted?
Augment lists Cosmos as self-hostable. Claude Code's product page does not specify a self-hosting option, so teams evaluating deployment control should ask the vendor directly. Augment's self-hosting option does not by itself answer questions about data export or portability.
Which tool has more developer integrations?
Claude Code lists GitHub, GitLab, command-line tools, VS Code, Cursor, Devin Desktop, JetBrains and Slack. Augment lists native triggers for GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira and schedules, plus typed webhooks for other tools. The better fit depends on whether you need coding clients or workflow triggers.